From jchome at jc-ix.net Tue Mar 2 11:04:30 2010 From: jchome at jc-ix.net (Frederic Jaeckel) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:04:30 +0100 Subject: [dn42] Please unfilter 80.244.241.224/27 Message-ID: <20100302110430.210a280ejchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> Since I use this network for services. Please unfilter it in dn42. Cheers, jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net Tue Mar 2 16:22:42 2010 From: tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net (Tobias Fiebig) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:22:42 +0100 Subject: [dn42] Please unfilter 195.191.196.0/23 Message-ID: <20100302152242.GA5971@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> Please unfilter 195.191.196.0/23, as it just has been assigned to me as pi-space. Br, Tobias From jchome at jc-ix.net Sat Mar 6 17:31:03 2010 From: jchome at jc-ix.net (Frederic Jaeckel) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:31:03 +0100 Subject: [dn42] request to release 172.22.160.0/19 Message-ID: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> Hi folks, do we want to release the following network as dn42 native network? since it's not really used for events it would be helpful to have more IPv4 space in dn42. inetnum: 172.22.160.0/19 (160..191) description: former "event networks", currently undergoing discussion description: please wait until there is a consensus for address/usage policy Cheers, jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net Sat Mar 6 17:37:36 2010 From: tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net (Tobias Fiebig) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:37:36 +0100 Subject: [dn42] request to release 172.22.160.0/19 In-Reply-To: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> References: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> Message-ID: <20100306163736.GA8014@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> Hi, > inetnum: 172.22.160.0/19 (160..191) > description: former "event networks", currently undergoing discussion > description: please wait until there is a consensus for address/usage policy Ack from me. I would appreciate it, if inetnum: 172.22.112.0/20 (112..127) description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" (LEGACY / phase out) admin-c: Astro and inetnum: 172.22.96.0/20 (96..111) description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" admin-c: Astro Could be released to. With best regards, Tobias From leon at leonweber.de Sat Mar 6 19:27:57 2010 From: leon at leonweber.de (Leon Weber) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:27:57 +0100 Subject: [dn42] request to release 172.22.160.0/19 In-Reply-To: <20100306163736.GA8014@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> References: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> <20100306163736.GA8014@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> Message-ID: <20100306182757.GI18049@zaphod.leonweber.de> On 06.03.2010 17:37:36, Tobias Fiebig wrote: > I would appreciate it, if > > inetnum: 172.22.96.0/20 (96..111) > description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" > admin-c: Astro > > Could be released to. Uhm, what makes you think 172.22.96.0/20 is unused? We're using it actively in our c3d2 HQ LAN. Leon -- Leon Weber, leon at leonweber.de 0x8E04D7FC leon at jabber.ccc.de From tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net Sat Mar 6 23:00:17 2010 From: tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net (Tobias Fiebig) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 23:00:17 +0100 Subject: [dn42] [REQ] Request to filter/depeer AS64667/172.22.67.0/24 Message-ID: <20100306220017.GA8889@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> Hello List, today r3vv7 assigned himself AS64667/172.22.67.0/24 from my netblock. After debugging him a little, I decided, that it might be the best solution, if he'd first familiarizes himself with bgp/openvpn/the differences between chaosvpn and dn42/how to assign ip, before he starts in the dn42. So, as of now, as admin-c of 172.22.64.0/20, i declare AS64667 and 172.22.67.0/24 as unassigned again. With best Regards, Tobias From fabian at datensalat.eu Sat Mar 13 12:20:29 2010 From: fabian at datensalat.eu (Fabian Fingerle) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 12:20:29 +0100 Subject: [dn42] Please unfilter 2001:470:9f58::/48 Message-ID: <201003131220.34059.fabian@datensalat.eu> please unfilter this v6-network: ! otih ipv6 prefix-list vpn-in seq 120 permit 2001:470:9f58::/48 http://www.dn42.net/trac/wiki/BGP_Filter -------------- n?chster Teil -------------- Ein Dateianhang mit Bin?rdaten wurde abgetrennt... Dateiname : nicht verf?gbar Dateityp : application/pgp-signature Dateigr??e : 198 bytes Beschreibung: This is a digitally signed message part. URL : From jchome at jc-ix.net Sat Mar 13 15:38:54 2010 From: jchome at jc-ix.net (Frederic Jaeckel) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:38:54 +0100 Subject: [dn42] request to release 172.22.160.0/19 In-Reply-To: <20100306182757.GI18049@zaphod.leonweber.de> References: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> <20100306163736.GA8014@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> <20100306182757.GI18049@zaphod.leonweber.de> Message-ID: <20100313153854.2cbbbf9b@jc-ix.net> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:27:57 +0100 Leon Weber wrote: > On 06.03.2010 17:37:36, Tobias Fiebig wrote: > > I would appreciate it, if > > > > inetnum: 172.22.96.0/20 (96..111) > > description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" > > admin-c: Astro > > > > Could be released to. > > Uhm, what makes you think 172.22.96.0/20 is unused? We're using it > actively in our c3d2 HQ LAN. I dont see the point either. About the other networks, I'm going to release them later this day. You have to cry _*NOW*_ if you don't want this. Thanks for your serious help. Frederic 'jchome' Jaeckel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: From astro at spaceboyz.net Sun Mar 14 23:58:26 2010 From: astro at spaceboyz.net (Astro) Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:58:26 +0100 Subject: [dn42] request to release 172.22.160.0/19 In-Reply-To: <20100306163736.GA8014@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> References: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> <20100306163736.GA8014@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> Message-ID: <20100314225826.GJ2345@chronos.sin> Tobias Fiebig wrote: > inetnum: 172.22.112.0/20 (112..127) > description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" (LEGACY / phase out) > admin-c: Astro DO. > inetnum: 172.22.96.0/20 (96..111) > description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" > admin-c: Astro DONT! From jchome at jc-ix.net Mon Mar 15 00:24:00 2010 From: jchome at jc-ix.net (Frederic Jaeckel) Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:24:00 +0100 Subject: [dn42] request to release 172.22.160.0/19 In-Reply-To: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> References: <20100306173103.68582265@jc-ix.net> Message-ID: <20100315002400.4c75156c@jc-ix.net> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 17:31:03 +0100 Frederic Jaeckel wrote: > inetnum: 172.22.160.0/19 (160..191) > description: former "event networks", currently undergoing discussion > description: please wait until there is a consensus for address/usage > policy > inetnum: 172.22.112.0/20 (112..127) > description: c3d2 "CCC Dresden" (LEGACY / phase out) > admin-c: Astro both freed as it appears on the wiki. Cheers, jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 195 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net Fri Mar 26 19:04:34 2010 From: tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net (Tobias Fiebig) Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:04:34 +0100 Subject: [dn42] Please restart OpenVPN peerings with AS64677 Message-ID: <20100326180431.GA4236@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net> Hi list, due to an addresschange of bgp.wybt.net and bgp2.wybt.net i have to ask all my peers to restart they openvpn-procs, in order to get the new dns resolved and the peerings up again. With best Regards, Tobias From equinox at diac24.net Sat Mar 27 19:02:29 2010 From: equinox at diac24.net (David Lamparter) Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:02:29 +0100 Subject: [dn42] BUGS: quagga-1.1.0-dn42.11 In-Reply-To: <20100219085431.GB29979@neo.maxx.net> References: <20100219085431.GB29979@neo.maxx.net> Message-ID: <1269712949.30739.12.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net> Am Freitag, den 19.02.2010, 09:54 +0100 schrieb maxx at spaceboyz.net: > 1) I did some testing involving the removal and recreation of some > tunnel interface which seemed to be the reason for zebra to suck as much > cpu as it can get. I'm sorry i did not investigate this further before > killing the process. Post-mortem analysis (less-ing log-files ;) did not > reveal any clues. Sorry for the very long delay on this... lack of debug info on most of our builds kinda made that more difficult than it had to be :/. (I've added debug info as configure default now) Anyway, fixed by commit be066ba3fa52ef82754532a419e18c166024cb80. Packages coming soon(tm). This will be tagged as quagga-1.1.0-dn42.12 unless someone has last-minute bugs to report. -equi From frapzzt at ccc.de Wed Mar 31 13:02:03 2010 From: frapzzt at ccc.de (frapzzt) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:02:03 +0200 Subject: [dn42] CCC Event Network AS13020 94.45.224.0/19 Message-ID: <20100331130203.4b1dd571@charon.mobile.frapzzt.de> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, please update your filters to allow as13020 and 94.45.224.0/19. Both are event ressources from the CCC. We are using them at the Easterhegg this weekend. If you want to use them at your event, just drop a mail. I will peer with equi/AS64602 and i accept 172.22.0.0/15. cheers --frapzzt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuzK6sACgkQ1jbXRWVc4TPvJACgjPhOwf/3ZChLweYyc7ZCR6rC QDMAnR2eSRCj/1Eep/8oJznkg+4zZ9aY =T18P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From equinox at diac24.net Wed Mar 31 15:25:44 2010 From: equinox at diac24.net (David Lamparter) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 15:25:44 +0200 Subject: [dn42] CCC Event Network AS13020 94.45.224.0/19 -- UP! In-Reply-To: <20100331130203.4b1dd571@charon.mobile.frapzzt.de> References: <20100331130203.4b1dd571@charon.mobile.frapzzt.de> Message-ID: <1270041944.8924.110.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net> Am Mittwoch, den 31.03.2010, 13:02 +0200 schrieb frapzzt: > please update your filters to allow as13020 and 94.45.224.0/19. > Both are event ressources from the CCC. We are using them at the > Easterhegg this weekend. If you want to use them at your event, just > drop a mail. As you might have noticed, the peering is up! You should see 94.45.224.0/19 in your tables. Ping 94.45.231.9 for test1ngz. Note only 172.22.0.0/15 source will work as frapzzt says: > I will peer with equi/AS64602 and i accept 172.22.0.0/15. We changed that to SBZ/AS64624 because the other end is a VM in Berlin, so no point in having a box /at/ the easterhegg peer. The traffic would go out, back in, and out again... Hope to see you at EH! -equi From helios at cyb0rg.org Wed Mar 31 18:53:09 2010 From: helios at cyb0rg.org (Moritz Rudert) Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:53:09 +0200 Subject: [dn42] unfilter request Message-ID: <4BB37DF5.90104@cyb0rg.org> Please unfilter http://dn42.net/trac/wiki/BGP_Filter?action=diff&version=36 greetings, helios