From equinox at diac24.net  Fri Feb  5 14:54:50 2010
From: equinox at diac24.net (David Lamparter)
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:54:50 +0100
Subject: [dn42] [RFC] quagga 1.1.0-dn42.11 in last-minute fixes process
Message-ID: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>

Hi quagga-dev list,
Hi dn42 list,


the dn42.11 release of quagga now is in the "last-minute fixes" state.
I've finished coding and merging the features I want to have in this
release, so now I need to find the (probably dozens of) bugs I've
introduced in the process.

You can find:
* a short release announcement at
  http://www.diac24.net/files/quagga/info-1.1.0-dn42.11.html
* a preliminary tarball at
  http://www.diac24.net/files/quagga/quagga-1.1.0-dn42.11.tar.bz2
* my git repo at
  git://spaceboyz.net/equinox/quagga.git
  http://git.spaceboyz.net/equinox/quagga.git

Please note that I'm accumulating and merging patches very freely. This
branch is not suitable for high-availability production use. Also, the
next few days I will probably be fixing bugs on the fly as I find them,
so if you can, use git.

Also note that there is no official quagga 1.1 or even 1.0 yet. I
increased the version number to 1.1.0 because at least 50% of the
patches I merged are most likely not going to be in quagga 1.0. They're
aimed at the "next" tree which will (probably) be named 1.1, so I guess
this version number is appropriate. I would've used 1.1.-1 ;-).

A big thanks to all the people contributing patches, and also to Paul
Jakma, Denis Ovisienko, Joakim Tjernlund, Stephen Hemminger and David
Ward for the work they to for and on quagga.


This version of quagga is supposed to run on Linux 2.6, NetBSD 5.0 and
FreeBSD 8.0. I'm hoping zebra, bgpd and ospfd are usable; ospf6d and
isisd might have quirks. pimd is wholly untested...

If you're brave enough to run this version of quagga, please provide
feedback - bugreports are very welcome, as are patches. Reports of
success are the most welcome of course!


-David Lamparter

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.spaceboyz.net/pipermail/dn42/attachments/20100205/e0839d91/attachment.pgp>

From equinox at diac24.net  Fri Feb  5 16:31:16 2010
From: equinox at diac24.net (David Lamparter)
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:31:16 +0100
Subject: [dn42] [quagga-dev 7776] [RFC] quagga 1.1.0-dn42.11 in
 last-minute fixes process
In-Reply-To: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
References: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
Message-ID: <1265383876.11038.518.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>

Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 14:54 +0100 schrieb David Lamparter:
> If you're brave enough to run this version of quagga, please provide
> feedback - bugreports are very welcome, as are patches. Reports of
> success are the most welcome of course!

.... aaaand I've tripped the first bug. bgpd SEGVs on establishing a
peering - ouch.

do a "git revert a8c48bb76f291c673438d2061753d05a0d9b3276" to avoid it.
uploading fixed version in a few minutes... its always these
innocent-looking don't-do-much patches...


-David


commit a8c48bb76f291c673438d2061753d05a0d9b3276
Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger at vyatta.com>
Date:   Wed Dec 9 17:28:48 2009 +0000

    bgp: move cleanup fifo code
    
    This patch started while looking at the compiler aliasing warnings
    from FIFO_HEAD() in BGP. Then I realized the FIFO code was only
    being used in BGP, so it made sense to move it from zebra to
    BGP.  In the process convert from macro's to inline and add more
    type safety.





From equinox at diac24.net  Fri Feb  5 17:45:48 2010
From: equinox at diac24.net (David Lamparter)
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:45:48 +0100
Subject: [dn42] [quagga-dev 7777] FIFO cleanup broken
In-Reply-To: <1265383876.11038.518.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
References: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
	<1265383876.11038.518.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
Message-ID: <1265388348.11038.534.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>

Stephen,


you get 100 points for one of the most well-hidden bugs I've ever seen:

@@ static inline void FIFO_ADD(...
-  fifo->prev = fifo->prev->next = node;
+  fifo->prev = fifo->prev->fifo.next = node;
@@ static inline void FIFO_DEL(...
-  fifo->prev->next = fifo->next;
-  fifo->next->prev = fifo->prev;
+  fifo->prev->fifo.next = fifo->next;
+  fifo->next->fifo.prev = fifo->prev;


I've changed bgp_advertise_fifo to store pointers to bgp_advertise_fifo
instead of bgp_advertise in my branch, this is way too much of a pitfall
as-is.

Oh, and actually it goes down from 3 casts to 1.
Patch attached, dn42.11 tarball fixed.

Cheers,


-David

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-bgpd-fix-bgp-move-cleanup-fifo-code.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2201 bytes
Desc: 
URL: <http://lists.spaceboyz.net/pipermail/dn42/attachments/20100205/7e846136/attachment.bin>

From shemminger at vyatta.com  Fri Feb  5 17:40:47 2010
From: shemminger at vyatta.com (Stephen Hemminger)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 08:40:47 -0800
Subject: [dn42] [quagga-dev 7776] [RFC] quagga 1.1.0-dn42.11 in
 last-minute fixes process
In-Reply-To: <1265383876.11038.518.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
References: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
	<1265383876.11038.518.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
Message-ID: <20100205084047.30227133@s6510>

On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:31:16 +0100
David Lamparter <equinox at diac24.net> wrote:

> Am Freitag, den 05.02.2010, 14:54 +0100 schrieb David Lamparter:
> > If you're brave enough to run this version of quagga, please provide
> > feedback - bugreports are very welcome, as are patches. Reports of
> > success are the most welcome of course!
> 
> .... aaaand I've tripped the first bug. bgpd SEGVs on establishing a
> peering - ouch.
> 
> do a "git revert a8c48bb76f291c673438d2061753d05a0d9b3276" to avoid it.
> uploading fixed version in a few minutes... its always these
> innocent-looking don't-do-much patches...
> 
> 
> -David
> 
> 
> commit a8c48bb76f291c673438d2061753d05a0d9b3276
> Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger at vyatta.com>
> Date:   Wed Dec 9 17:28:48 2009 +0000
> 
>     bgp: move cleanup fifo code
>     
>     This patch started while looking at the compiler aliasing warnings
>     from FIFO_HEAD() in BGP. Then I realized the FIFO code was only
>     being used in BGP, so it made sense to move it from zebra to
>     BGP.  In the process convert from macro's to inline and add more
>     type safety.
> 
> 
> 

Yes, ignore that patch. It isn't needed, and we don't run it in our tree.


From shemminger at vyatta.com  Fri Feb  5 18:48:20 2010
From: shemminger at vyatta.com (Stephen Hemminger)
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:48:20 -0800
Subject: [dn42] [quagga-dev 7777] FIFO cleanup broken
In-Reply-To: <1265388348.11038.534.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
References: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
	<1265383876.11038.518.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
	<1265388348.11038.534.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
Message-ID: <20100205094820.5011ce78@nehalam>

On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:45:48 +0100
David Lamparter <equinox at diac24.net> wrote:

> Stephen,
> 
> 
> you get 100 points for one of the most well-hidden bugs I've ever seen:
> 
> @@ static inline void FIFO_ADD(...
> -  fifo->prev = fifo->prev->next = node;
> +  fifo->prev = fifo->prev->fifo.next = node;
> @@ static inline void FIFO_DEL(...
> -  fifo->prev->next = fifo->next;
> -  fifo->next->prev = fifo->prev;
> +  fifo->prev->fifo.next = fifo->next;
> +  fifo->next->fifo.prev = fifo->prev;
> 
> 
> I've changed bgp_advertise_fifo to store pointers to bgp_advertise_fifo
> instead of bgp_advertise in my branch, this is way too much of a pitfall
> as-is.
> 
> Oh, and actually it goes down from 3 casts to 1.
> Patch attached, dn42.11 tarball fixed.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> -David
> 

Thanks for fixing it. not sure why the bug crept in.

-- 


From drixter at e-utp.net  Sat Feb  6 20:24:42 2010
From: drixter at e-utp.net (Marcin Gondek)
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:24:42 +0100
Subject: [dn42] Looking for additional peer
Message-ID: <3D81D4ED-C1F9-4BBA-A071-563684AE2A4E@e-utp.net>

Hi,

First of all I want to say "hello" to everyone :-)

I'm currently connected with dn42/diac/spaceboyz via Helios's node @ Hetzner as a part of Hetzner IPv6 Project.

Currently I'm looking for a backup peer from HostEurope DataCenter, anyone open? For best a node with 10Mbit+ symetric link.

Peer and traffiic will be IPv6 only.

Or can I also request dn42 subblock when my AS number is not "compatiable" with dn42 rules:

Netnumber
We have the AS Numbers: 64..
Your AS number is: 64600+n
Your own network is: 172.22.n.0/25

I'm managing currenly a AS65000, AS65100, AS65101, AS65102, AS65200, 

More explaination on the map:

http://www.e-utp.net/images/IPv6.jpg

Thanks in Advance

Regards,

-- 
Marcin Gondek / Drixter
e-utp.net





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.spaceboyz.net/pipermail/dn42/attachments/20100206/02a6ec06/attachment.htm>

From casandro at casandro.dyndns.org  Sat Feb  6 22:39:28 2010
From: casandro at casandro.dyndns.org (Christian Berger)
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:39:28 +0100
Subject: [dn42] Peering with Freifunk Franken
Message-ID: <201002062239.31336.casandro@casandro.dyndns.org>

Servus, (=bavarian for hello and goodbye)

I'd like to anounce experimental peering with the Freifunk Franken network on 
10.50.0.0/16 seems to be working right now.

If you have any problems, just e-mail me.

Servus
  Casandro

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.spaceboyz.net/pipermail/dn42/attachments/20100206/e8f1dd01/attachment.pgp>

From dn42 at kevinsteen.net  Mon Feb  8 15:38:13 2010
From: dn42 at kevinsteen.net (Kevin Steen)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:38:13 +0000
Subject: [dn42] New node seeks peers
Message-ID: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>

After watching the 26C3 presentation and hearing there are others who
also like to play with BGP, I'd like to join up to the dn42 network.

My servers are physically wired to the 'Net in London, UK - are there
any 'nearby' peers?

I use openvpn between servers at the moment and I've played a bit with
quagga, but all guidance is appreciated. I'm also interested in
experimenting with multicast, video streaming, IPv6 and P2P vpns.

Thanks in advance
-Skyguy

skyguy at jabber.ccc.de




From sebastian at laubscher.name  Mon Feb  8 15:49:42 2010
From: sebastian at laubscher.name (Sebastian Laubscher)
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 15:49:42 +0100
Subject: [dn42] New node seeks peers
In-Reply-To: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>
References: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>
Message-ID: <aa0983321002080649g2399ba6akd0c965d721f4ad1e@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Kevin,

2010/2/8 Kevin Steen <dn42 at kevinsteen.net>:
> My servers are physically wired to the 'Net in London, UK - are there
> any 'nearby' peers?
I'm not really in the neighborhood, but if you need another v4 peer
located in Germany, just drop me a line.

Bye,
  Sebastian


From schrodinger at konundrum.org  Mon Feb  8 17:01:09 2010
From: schrodinger at konundrum.org (Schrodinger)
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 16:01:09 +0000
Subject: [dn42] New node seeks peers
In-Reply-To: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>
References: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>
Message-ID: <20100208160109.GA50263@purplehaze.kerna.ie>

On 2010/02/08 14:38, Kevin Steen wrote:
> After watching the 26C3 presentation and hearing there are others who
> also like to play with BGP, I'd like to join up to the dn42 network.
> 
> My servers are physically wired to the 'Net in London, UK - are there
> any 'nearby' peers?
> 
> I use openvpn between servers at the moment and I've played a bit with
> quagga, but all guidance is appreciated. I'm also interested in
> experimenting with multicast, video streaming, IPv6 and P2P vpns.
> 
> Thanks in advance
> -Skyguy
> 
> skyguy at jabber.ccc.de

Hello,

I'm in Ireland. I'll give you a shout later on.

Check my signature for contact details, or schrodinger at jabber.ccc.de or
in the dn42 jabber conference.

Cheers,
Conor.

> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dn42 mailing list
> dn42 at lists.spaceboyz.net
> http://lists.spaceboyz.net/mailman/listinfo/dn42

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
It was a new day yesterday, but it's an old day now.
MSN: schro5 at hotmail.com
ICQ: 112562229
GPG: http://www.konundrum.org/schro.asc
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.spaceboyz.net/pipermail/dn42/attachments/20100208/ed9ccf8c/attachment.pgp>

From dn42 at kevinsteen.net  Mon Feb  8 21:17:27 2010
From: dn42 at kevinsteen.net (Kevin Steen)
Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:17:27 +0000
Subject: [dn42] New node seeks peers
In-Reply-To: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>
References: <1265639893.2108.16.camel@rover>
Message-ID: <1265660247.2108.26.camel@rover>

On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 14:38 +0000, Kevin Steen wrote:
> After watching the 26C3 presentation and hearing there are others who
> also like to play with BGP, I'd like to join up to the dn42 network.

Not even 6 hours later and I'm connected!

Thanks to ichdasich for helping me setup my first link.

To crest, Sebastian and Schroedinger who also offered peering, thank
you, but I'd like to do some bgp-learning before taking you up on your
offers.

-skyguy



From paul at jakma.org  Tue Feb  9 20:24:52 2010
From: paul at jakma.org (paul at jakma.org)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 19:24:52 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [dn42] [quagga-dev 7776] [RFC] quagga 1.1.0-dn42.11 in
 last-minute fixes process
In-Reply-To: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
References: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002091916030.27055@stoner.jakma.org>

On Fri, 5 Feb 2010, David Lamparter wrote:

>  http://git.spaceboyz.net/equinox/quagga.git

This is great!

However, it isn't pullable into Quagga upstream as it stands, given 
the free form commit messages versus the desired commit messages 
documented in HACKING (along with the rationale).

It'd be a nice if we got a consensus on updating HACKING, and it'd 
perhaps be nice if commit messages followed the requested format 
until then, regardless of personal opinion (cause otherwise the 
committing maintainer may have to write the message - and that does 
not scale).

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Illusion is the first of all pleasures.
 		-- Voltaire


From paul at jakma.org  Tue Feb  9 22:39:37 2010
From: paul at jakma.org (paul at jakma.org)
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 21:39:37 +0000 (GMT)
Subject: [dn42] [quagga-dev 7776] [RFC] quagga 1.1.0-dn42.11 in
 last-minute fixes process
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002091916030.27055@stoner.jakma.org>
References: <1265378090.11038.505.camel@arkology.n2.diac24.net>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1002091916030.27055@stoner.jakma.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1002092138360.27055@stoner.jakma.org>

On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, paul at jakma.org wrote:

> It'd be a nice if we got a consensus on updating HACKING,

This may have sounded snarky - it wasn't meant to be. Jus that 
someone needs to submit the HACKING diff though and put it up for 
discussion.

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
Fortune:
Software, n.:
 	Formal evening attire for female computer analysts.


From arian at sanusi.de  Thu Feb 11 14:33:57 2010
From: arian at sanusi.de (Arian Sanusi)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:33:57 +0100
Subject: [dn42] seeking peers
Message-ID: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>

Hi,

I am Ari from CCC HB | CCC ZH and want to participate dn42 with my WG (
shared flat ). I am currently peered with tim (AS 64825) and crest (AS
64828) and would like some more links :)

router is a openbsd box running bgpd, network details:
172.22.30.0/25
AS64630
physical internet connection is 15M/1M5 cable

thanks,
ari
xmpp: ari at unstable.nl


From tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net  Thu Feb 11 14:48:21 2010
From: tobias.fiebig at wouldyoubuythis.net (Tobias Fiebig)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:48:21 +0100
Subject: [dn42] seeking peers
In-Reply-To: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>
References: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>
Message-ID: <20100211134820.GB4316@mail.wouldyoubuythis.net>

Hi there,
> router is a openbsd box running bgpd, network details:
> 172.22.30.0/25
> AS64630
> physical internet connection is 15M/1M5 cable
Just jabber ichdasich at jabber.ccc.de. 

With best regards,
Tobias


From fabian at datensalat.eu  Thu Feb 11 16:18:31 2010
From: fabian at datensalat.eu (fabian at datensalat.eu)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:18:31 +0100
Subject: [dn42] seeking peers
In-Reply-To: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>
References: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>
Message-ID: <95bfe71917c0da94b605486bb52533a6@localhost>

Hi,

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:33:57 +0100, Arian Sanusi <arian at sanusi.de> wrote:
> 64828) and would like some more links :)

jabber: fabian at datensalat.eu

Yours
 Fabian


From tobias at linuxdingsda.de  Thu Feb 11 18:03:29 2010
From: tobias at linuxdingsda.de (Tobias Winter)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:03:29 +0100
Subject: [dn42] seeking peers
In-Reply-To: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>
References: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de>
Message-ID: <4B743861.9090008@linuxdingsda.de>

On 02/11/2010 02:33 PM, Arian Sanusi wrote:
> router is a openbsd box running bgpd, network details:
> 172.22.30.0/25
> AS64630
> physical internet connection is 15M/1M5 cable
Since you don't have 100Mbit full duplex, please remember to prepend
your AS number in order to not become a transit with little bandwidth.

-- wintix

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 261 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.spaceboyz.net/pipermail/dn42/attachments/20100211/cd5a5683/attachment.pgp>

From arian at sanusi.de  Thu Feb 11 19:02:47 2010
From: arian at sanusi.de (Arian Sanusi)
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:02:47 +0100
Subject: [dn42] seeking peers
In-Reply-To: <4B743861.9090008@linuxdingsda.de>
References: <4B740745.5040600@sanusi.de> <4B743861.9090008@linuxdingsda.de>
Message-ID: <4B744647.5070209@sanusi.de>


> Since you don't have 100Mbit full duplex, please remember to prepend
> your AS number in order to not become a transit with little bandwidth.
>   
already did so, thx for your advice

ari


From bef at erlangen.ccc.de  Tue Feb 16 20:39:18 2010
From: bef at erlangen.ccc.de (BeF)
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:39:18 +0100
Subject: [dn42] Subscribed/FYI
Message-ID: <4B7AF466.6010605@erlangen.ccc.de>

Hi there,

you may have seen my nick while browsing the nd42-wiki. I just
subscribed this list for even better communication - FYI.

Cheers,
BeF


From maxx at spaceboyz.net  Fri Feb 19 09:54:31 2010
From: maxx at spaceboyz.net (maxx at spaceboyz.net)
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:54:31 +0100
Subject: [dn42] BUGS: quagga-1.1.0-dn42.11
Message-ID: <20100219085431.GB29979@neo.maxx.net>

Hey,

I've experienced two flaws up to now:

 0) When using zebra itself to write it's own configuration back to a
 file it appends the scope identifier to 'ipv6 address' (...scope foo) but
 in turn is unable to use this when reading back it's configuration after
 restart. (invalid command)

 1) I did some testing involving the removal and recreation of some
 tunnel interface which seemed to be the reason for zebra to suck as much
 cpu as it can get. I'm sorry i did not investigate this further before
 killing the process. Post-mortem analysis (less-ing log-files ;) did not
 reveal any clues.

Greetings
MaxX