From jchome at jc-ix.net Thu Apr 8 16:46:00 2010 From: jchome at jc-ix.net (Frederic Jaeckel) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:46:00 +0200 Subject: [dn42] aeh? Message-ID: <20100408164600.0a603fd9jchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> hotshot.. why the hell are you announcing 172.23.23.0/24 in dn42? This space is not designated for using it right now.. regards, jc -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From chris at rootkit.de Sun Apr 11 14:02:54 2010 From: chris at rootkit.de (Christian Esser) Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 14:02:54 +0200 Subject: [dn42] aeh? In-Reply-To: <20100408164600.0a603fd9jchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> References: <20100408164600.0a603fd9jchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> Message-ID: <4BC1BA6E.7000009@rootkit.de> hi jc, some months ago we talked about this on #d42. I'm using this network for some experiments and the owners are not motivated to renumber for dn42 or chaosvpn. regards, hotshot On 04/08/2010 04:46 PM, Frederic Jaeckel wrote: > hotshot.. why the hell are you announcing 172.23.23.0/24 in dn42? > This space is not designated for using it right now.. > > regards, > jc > From drixter at e-utp.net Mon Apr 12 20:28:31 2010 From: drixter at e-utp.net (Marcin Gondek) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:28:31 +0200 Subject: [dn42] 172.22.164.0/23 Message-ID: Hi, I'm trying to get 172.22.164.0/23 for using @ my nodes, but it's seems to be used by: inetnum: 172.22.160.0/19 (160..191) description: former "event networks", currently undergoing discussion description: please wait until there is a consensus for address/usage policy It will be ok when I use this /23 or should I take something other network? If so, which one? Regards, -- Marcin Gondek / Drixter e-utp.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobias at linuxdingsda.de Tue Apr 13 23:21:39 2010 From: tobias at linuxdingsda.de (Tobias Winter) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:21:39 +0200 Subject: [dn42] aeh? In-Reply-To: <4BC1BA6E.7000009@rootkit.de> References: <20100408164600.0a603fd9jchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> <4BC1BA6E.7000009@rootkit.de> Message-ID: <4BC4E063.5070701@linuxdingsda.de> Christian Esser wrote: > hi jc, > > some months ago we talked about this on #d42. I'm using this network > for some experiments and the owners are not motivated to renumber for what owners of what? > dn42 or chaosvpn. > > regards, > hotshot > > On 04/08/2010 04:46 PM, Frederic Jaeckel wrote: >> hotshot.. why the hell are you announcing 172.23.23.0/24 in dn42? >> This space is not designated for using it right now.. >> >> regards, >> jc >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > dn42 mailing list > dn42 at lists.spaceboyz.net > http://lists.spaceboyz.net/mailman/listinfo/dn42 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 261 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From hotshot at koeln.ccc.de Mon Apr 19 01:50:15 2010 From: hotshot at koeln.ccc.de (hotshot) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:50:15 +0200 Subject: [dn42] aeh? In-Reply-To: <4BC4E063.5070701@linuxdingsda.de> References: <20100408164600.0a603fd9jchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> <4BC1BA6E.7000009@rootkit.de> <4BC4E063.5070701@linuxdingsda.de> Message-ID: <4BCB9AB7.8000309@koeln.ccc.de> Good morning, 64662 (C4) supports chaosvpn and dn42 but fears renumbering, ressource usage and other things. I am using sip and iax betwen 64659 and 64662 and have trouble with nat, so I announced 172.23.23.0/24. Now i have a ugly pack of filter rules and 172.23.23.0/24 is only visible between 64658, 64659 und 64662. Regards, hotshot On 04/13/2010 11:21 PM, Tobias Winter wrote: > Christian Esser wrote: > >> hi jc, >> >> some months ago we talked about this on #d42. I'm using this network >> for some experiments and the owners are not motivated to renumber for >> > what owners of what? > >> dn42 or chaosvpn. >> >> regards, >> hotshot >> >> On 04/08/2010 04:46 PM, Frederic Jaeckel wrote: >> >>> hotshot.. why the hell are you announcing 172.23.23.0/24 in dn42? >>> This space is not designated for using it right now.. >>> >>> regards, >>> jc >>> >>> From astro at spaceboyz.net Mon Apr 19 19:41:14 2010 From: astro at spaceboyz.net (Astro) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 19:41:14 +0200 Subject: [dn42] aeh? In-Reply-To: <4BCB9AB7.8000309@koeln.ccc.de> References: <20100408164600.0a603fd9jchome@jc-ix.net@jc-ix.net> <4BC1BA6E.7000009@rootkit.de> <4BC4E063.5070701@linuxdingsda.de> <4BCB9AB7.8000309@koeln.ccc.de> Message-ID: <20100419174114.GB2230@chronos.sin> hotshot wrote: > 64662 (C4) supports chaosvpn and dn42 but fears renumbering, ressource > usage and other things. > I am using sip and iax betwen 64659 and 64662 and have trouble with nat, > so I announced 172.23.23.0/24. > > Now i have a ugly pack of filter rules and 172.23.23.0/24 is only > visible between 64658, 64659 und 64662. :-(